Top Ukrainian Software Development Companies

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Yalantis (4.1/5) edges ahead of Cleveroad (3.8/5) overall. Yalantis is the better choice for regulated healthtech or IoT builds needing compliance-fluent engineers. Cleveroad is the stronger option for buyers who want general-purpose delivery from a Western-facing office. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: head-to-head summary

Criterion Yalantis Cleveroad
Founded 2008 2011
HQ Warsaw, Poland (Dnipro-founded) New York, USA / Manchester, UK (Kharkiv delivery center)
Team size 201–500 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)
Rating 4.1 / 5 3.8 / 5
Primary differentiator A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT software engineering practice No single named specialty, which itself signals broad general-purpose engineering capacity
Pricing model Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements Fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack React Native, Node.js, AWS React, React Native, Node.js
Industries served Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech Retail, Logistics, Healthcare

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: overview

Yalantis

Compliance-heavy healthcare and IoT product engineering is Yalantis's actual specialty, built up since its 2008 founding in Dnipro by a team now in the 201-500 range. The corporate headquarters has since moved to Warsaw, though the engineering focus on regulated, connected software hasn't shifted. A buyer specifically seeking a Ukraine-headquartered software development company, rather than a Ukraine-founded one, should confirm current domicile before assuming continuity.

Cleveroad

Cleveroad doesn't lead with a single named technical specialty; its 2011-founded team builds general custom software and mobile apps for startups and mid-size businesses from offices in New York, Los Angeles, Manchester, and a Kharkiv development center. That absence of a niche focus is itself useful information: a buyer gets broad, general-purpose delivery capacity and a Western commercial contact point instead of a boutique's narrow expertise. Case studies span web and mobile work across several industries rather than concentrating on one.

Services and capabilities: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Capability Yalantis Cleveroad
Custom software development
Mobile development
Cloud & DevOps
AI/ML development
Dedicated development teams
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Framework / platform Yalantis Cleveroad
React
AWS N/A
Java N/A N/A
Python N/A
.NET N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Criterion Yalantis Cleveroad
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Dedicated team, Fixed project Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Dimension Yalantis Cleveroad
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech Retail, Logistics, Healthcare
Best use cases A healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware software engineering., An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. A startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based development., A mid-market business needing general web or mobile software.
Typical project type Dedicated team Fixed project

Yalantis vs Cleveroad: pros and cons

Yalantis
+ Visible healthcare-compliance and IoT engineering specialization backed by public case studies.
+ Mid-size team large enough for real product programs, still founder-accessible.
+ Warsaw headquarters gives an EU corporate entity for buyers who want that structure.
- Headquarters relocated from Ukraine to Poland, so this is not strictly a Ukraine-domiciled company today
- Team size caps how many concurrent large programs it can staff
Cleveroad
+ Multiple commercial offices in the US and UK give buyers a choice of contracting entity.
+ Mid-size team suited to startup and mid-market project scale.
+ Over a decade of continuous operation since 2011.
- General-purpose positioning without a clearly named technical specialization
- Kharkiv is one of several offices rather than the company's sole development base

Who should choose Yalantis?

A typical fit: a healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware software engineering.

A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT software engineering practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Fintech.

Who should choose Cleveroad?

A typical fit: a startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based development.

No single named specialty, which itself signals broad general-purpose engineering capacity. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Logistics, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Yalantis
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Yalantis
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Yalantis (Not published) vs Cleveroad (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Yalantis
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Use case Yalantis fit Cleveroad fit Winner
A healthtech company needing HIPAA- or MDR-aware software engineering. Strong Strong Both equally
An IoT hardware company needing both device integration and application software. Strong Strong Both equally
A startup wanting a US or UK commercial point of contact alongside Ukraine-based development. Strong Strong Both equally
A mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. Strong Strong Both equally
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Yalantis vs Cleveroad

Yalantis (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Ukrainian Software Development projects. A compliance-focused healthcare and IoT software engineering practice.

Cleveroad (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need a mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. If your situation matches that, Cleveroad is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Yalantis vs Cleveroad FAQ

Is Yalantis better than Cleveroad?

Yalantis (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Yalantis's strongest advantage: visible healthcare-compliance and IoT engineering specialization backed by public case studies. Cleveroad's strongest advantage: multiple commercial offices in the US and UK give buyers a choice of contracting entity.

How do Yalantis and Cleveroad differ in pricing?

Yalantis uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Cleveroad uses fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Yalantis or Cleveroad?

Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Yalantis and Cleveroad?

Yalantis's primary differentiator is: a compliance-focused healthcare and IoT software engineering practice. Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: no single named specialty, which itself signals broad general-purpose engineering capacity. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Logistics vs Retail, Logistics).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.